Evaluating Blockchain for the Governance of the Plasma Derivatives Supply Chain: How Distributed Ledger Technology Can Mitigate Plasma Supply Chain Risks

Teijo Peltoniemi ,
Teijo Peltoniemi
Jarkko Ihalainen
Jarkko Ihalainen

Published: 04.01.2019.

Biochemistry

Volume 2, Issue 1 (2019)

pp. 1-13;

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v2.107

Abstract

Objective: This exploratory study examines how distributed ledger technologies could be used within the plasma derivatives supply chain. The plasma derivatives are used increasingly in the pharmaceutical market and the supply chain is global. However, there are significant risks relating to the governance of the supply. The risks include unclear origin of plasma and the propagation of contaminated or poor-quality blood to the pharmaceutical production process. From an ethical perspective, the risk is that vulnerable individuals are exploited in the donation process. Finally, the plasma supply chain currently depends on only a few exporters of plasma, which presents a supply chain risk. Design: The blockchain technology is piloted in other areas of pharmaceutical supply chains and in this study we examine those solutions and conceptualize how a similar solution can be applied to the plasma supply chain. We identify risks within the plasma supply chain and discuss how blockchain-based solutions can mitigate those risks. Results: Drawing on existing literature within the pharmaceutical blockchain arena, we introduce a solution to verify the origin of plasma. We also model how the blockchain technology can be used to tackle ethical and supply chain risks. Conclusions: Blockchain can have a role in mitigating plasma supply chain risks. The area is, however, novel and requires more research.

Keywords

References

1.
Beliën J, Forcé H. Supply chain management of blood products: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research. 2012;217(1):1–16.
2.
Farrugia A. Safety Issues of Plasma-Derived Products for Treatment of Inherited Bleeding Disorders. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2016;42(05):583–8.
3.
Janvier S, De Spiegeleer B, Vanhee C, Deconinck E. Falsification of biotechnology drugs: current dangers and/or future disasters? Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2018;161:175–91.
4.
Tseng JH, Liao YC, Chong B, Liao S wei. Governance on the Drug Supply Chain via Gcoin Blockchain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(6):1055.
5.
Hevner, March, Park, Ram. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly. 2004;28(1):75.
6.
Underwood S. Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communications of the ACM. 2016;59(11):15–7.
7.
Hussein AF, ArunKumar N, Ramirez-Gonzalez G, Abdulhay E, Tavares JMRS, de Albuquerque VHC. A medical records managing and securing blockchain based system supported by a Genetic Algorithm and Discrete Wavelet Transform. Cognitive Systems Research. 2018;52:1–11.
8.
Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S, Park S, Smolander K. Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE. 11(10):e0163477.
9.
Garcia P. Biometrics on the blockchain. Biometric Technology Today. 2018;2018(5):5–7.
10.
Liang J, Li L, Zeng D. Evolutionary dynamics of cryptocurrency transaction networks: An empirical study. PLOS ONE. 13(8):e0202202.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles