Toward Application of Blockchain for Improved Health Records Management and Patient Care

Gracie Carter ,
Gracie Carter
Denise White ,
Denise White
Anusha Nalla ,
Anusha Nalla
Hossain Shahriar ,
Hossain Shahriar
Sweta Sneha
Sweta Sneha

Published: 04.01.2019.

Biochemistry

Volume 2, Issue 1 (2019)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v2.37

Abstract

Technological advancements have proven to be indispensable for improving patient care, yet they continue to present a host of problems. One of the most pressing concerns is how to improve quality of care while controlling costs. Beyond clinical care, one plausible solution is to share patient information freely and efficiently. Hospitals and clinics may share data internally, but external information sharing remains an issue. Despite the digitization of medical records, there remains a lack of adequate computing infrastructure or unwillingness to share data among providers. Care quality often suffers as a result. Implementing a type of peer-to-peer distributed digital technology, known as a blockchain, to record and transmit transactional data could be a solution to these concerns. Originally, blockchain was developed to record cryptocurrency transactions. However, as blockchain technologies have matured and adopted across dissimilar industries, the feasibility of possible applications of blockchain technology in healthcare is getting more attention. This article explores possible opportunities of adoption of blockchain technology to improve patient data security, privacy, and care while outlining the challenges that practitioners may encounter.

Keywords

References

1.
Kim D, Kagel JH, Tayal N, Bose-Brill S, Lai A. The Effects of Doctor-Patient Portal Use on Health Care Utilization Rates and Cost Savings. SSRN Electronic Journal.
2.
Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(6):501–4.
3.
Lapsia V, Lamb K, Yasnoff WA. Where should electronic records for patients be stored? International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2012;81(12):821–7.
4.
Bosworth HB, Zullig LL, Mendys P, Ho M, Trygstad T, Granger C, et al. Health Information Technology: Meaningful Use and Next Steps to Improving Electronic Facilitation of Medication Adherence. JMIR Medical Informatics. 4(1):e9.
5.
Azaria A, Ekblaw A, Vieira T, Lippman A. MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management. 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD). 2016.
6.
Zhang R, Liu L. Security Models and Requirements for Healthcare Application Clouds. 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2010. p. 268–75.
7.
Engelhardt MA. Hitching Healthcare to the Chain: An Introduction to Blockchain Technology in the Healthcare Sector. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2017;7(10):22–34.
8.
Sneha S, Varshney U. Enabling ubiquitous patient monitoring: Model, decision protocols, opportunities and challenges. Decision Support Systems. 2009;46(3):606–19.
9.
Ichikawa D, Kashiyama M, Ueno T. Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 5(7):e111.
10.
Dhanireddy S, Walker J, Reisch L, Oster N, Delbanco T, Elmore JG. The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records. Health Expectations. 2014;17(5):724–32.
11.
Lemieux VL. Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal. 2016;26(2):110–39.
12.
ADLER‐MILSTEIN J, PFEIFER E. Information Blocking: Is It Occurring and What Policy Strategies Can Address It? The Milbank Quarterly. 2017;95(1):117–35.
13.
Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access. 2016;4:2292–303.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles