Ethical Implementation of the Learning Healthcare System with Blockchain Technology

Marielle S. Gross ,
Marielle S. Gross
Robert C. Miller
Robert C. Miller

Published: 04.01.2019.

Biochemistry

Volume 2, Issue 1 (2019)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v2.113

Abstract

We propose that blockchain technology complemented by secure computation methods can foster implementation of a learning healthcare system (LHCS) by minimizing upfront patient-facing compromises with unsurpassed data security and privacy, and by optimizing the system’s fulfillment of its obligations to respect patients through transparency, engagement, and accountability. We demonstrate how a blockchain-enabled LHCS could foster patient willingness to contribute to learning by providing desired security and control over health data. In addition, secure computation methods could enable meta-analysis without exposing individual-level data, thus allowing the system to protect patients’ privacy while simultaneously learning from their data. The transparency and immutability of blockchain ledgers would also support the public’s trust in the system by allowing patients to audit and oversee which of their data are used, how they are used, and by whom. Furthermore, blockchain communities are community-governed peer-to-peer networks in which sharing builds mutually beneficial value, offering a model for engaging patients as LHCS stakeholders. Smart contracts could be used to ensure accountability of the system by embedding feedback mechanisms by which patients directly and automatically realize benefits of sharing their data.

Keywords

References

1.
Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics. Hastings Center Report. 2013;43(s1).
2.
Mouton Dorey C, Baumann H, Biller-Andorno N. Patient data and patient rights: Swiss healthcare stakeholders’ ethical awareness regarding large patient data sets – a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2018;19(1).
3.
McLennan S, Kahrass H, Wieschowski S, Strech D, Langhof H. The spectrum of ethical issues in a Learning Health Care System: a systematic qualitative review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2018;30(3):161–8.
4.
Weinfurt KP, Bollinger JM, Brelsford KM, Crayton TJ, Topazian RJ, Kass NE, et al. Patients’ views concerning research on medical practices: Implications for consent. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2016;7(2):76–91.
5.
Davis JS, Osoba O. Improving privacy preservation policy in the modern information age. Health and Technology. 2019;9(1):65–75.
6.
Kass N, Faden R, Fabi RE, Morain S, Hallez K, Whicher D, et al. Alternative consent models for comparative effectiveness studies: Views of patients from two institutions. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2016;7(2):92–105.
7.
Goertzel B, Goertzel T, Goertzel Z. The global brain and the emerging economy of abundance: Mutualism, open collaboration, exchange networks and the automated commons. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;114:65–73.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles