Securing the Chain of Custody and Integrity of Data in a Global North-South Partnership to Monitor the Quality of Essential Medicines

Kathleen Hayes Orcid logo ,
Kathleen Hayes
Natalie Meyers Orcid logo ,
Natalie Meyers
Christopher Sweet Orcid logo ,
Christopher Sweet
Ayenew Ashenef Orcid logo ,
Ayenew Ashenef
Tim Johann Orcid logo ,
Tim Johann
Marya Lieberman Orcid logo ,
Marya Lieberman
David Kochalko Orcid logo
David Kochalko

Published: 21.03.2022.

Biochemistry

Volume 5, Issue 2 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v5.230

Abstract

Substandard and falsified (SF) pharmaceuticals account for an estimated 10% of the pharmaceutical supply chain in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where a lack of regulatory and laboratory resources limits the ability to conduct effective post-market surveillance and allows SF products to penetrate the supply chain. The Distributed Pharmaceutical Analysis Laboratory (DPAL) was established in 2014 to expand testing of pharmaceutical dosage forms sourced from LMICs; DPAL is an alliance of academic institutions throughout the United States and abroad that provides high quality, validated chemical analysis of pharmaceutical dosage forms sourced from partners in LMICs. Results from analysis are reported to relevant regulatory agencies and are used to inform purchasing decisions made by in-country stakeholders. As the DPAL program has expanded to testing more than 1000 pharmaceutical dosage forms annually, challenges have surfaced regarding data management and sample tracking. Here, we describe a pilot project between DPAL and ARTiFACTs that applies blockchain to organize and manage key data generated during the DPAL workflow, including a sample’s progress through the workflow, its physical location, provenance of metadata, and lab reputability. Recording time and date stamps with this data will create a permanent and verifiable chain-of-custody for samples. This secure, distributed ledger will be linked to an easy-to-use dashboard, allowing stakeholders to view results and experimental details for each sample in real time and verify the integrity of DPAL analysis data. Introducing this blockchain-based system as a pilot will allow us to test the technology with real users analyzing real samples. Feedback from users will be recorded and necessary adjustments will be made to the system before the implementation of blockchain across all DPAL sites. Anticipated benefits of implementing blockchain for managing DPAL data include efficient management for routing work, increasing throughput, creating a chain of custody for samples and their data in alignment with the distributed nature of DPAL, and using the analysis results to detect patterns of quality within and across brands of products and develop enhanced sampling techniques and best practices. 

Keywords

References

1.
WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring System for substandard and falsified medical products.
2.
A study on the public health and socioeconomic impact of substandard and falsified medical products.
3.
Roth L, Bempong D, Babigumira JB, Banoo S, Cooke E, Jeffreys D, et al. Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems. Globalization and Health. 2018;14(1).
4.
Ndomondo-Sigonda M, Miot J, Naidoo S, Dodoo A, Kaale E. Medicines Regulation in Africa: Current State and Opportunities. Pharmaceutical Medicine. 2017;31(6):383–97.
5.
Bliese SL, Berta M, Lieberman M. Involving Students in the Distributed Pharmaceutical Analysis Laboratory: A Citizen-Science Project to Evaluate Global Medicine Quality. Journal of Chemical Education. 2020;97(11):3976–83.
6.
Weaver AA, Reiser H, Barstis T, Benvenuti M, Ghosh D, Hunckler M, et al. Paper Analytical Devices for Fast Field Screening of Beta Lactam Antibiotics and Antituberculosis Pharmaceuticals. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85(13):6453–60.
7.
Kochalko D, Morris C, Rollins J. Applying blockchain solutions to address research reproducibility and enable scientometric analysis. 2018;395–403.
8.
Heaven D. Bitcoin for the biological literature. Nature. 2019;(7742):141–3.
9.
Kochalko D. Making the unconventional conventional: How blockchain contributes to reshaping scholarly communications. Information Services & Use. 2019;39(3):199–204.
10.
Benchoufi M, Ravaud P. Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality. Trials. 2017;18(1).
11.
Choudhury O, Sarker H, Rudolph N. Enforcing human subject regulations using blockchain and smart contracts. 2018;
12.
Javed IT, Alharbi F, Bellaj B, Margaria T, Crespi N, Qureshi KN. Health-ID: A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Identity Management for Remote Healthcare. Healthcare. 2021;9(6):712.
13.
Kuo TT, Kim HE, Ohno-Machado L. Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017;24(6):1211–20.
14.
Attili S, Ladwa S, Sharma U, Trenkle A. Blockchain: the chain of trust and its potential to transform healthcare-our point of view. ONC/NIST Use of Blockchain for Healthcare and Research Workshop. ONC. 2016;
15.
Bliese SL, Maina M, Were P, Lieberman M. Detection of degraded, adulterated, and falsified ceftriaxone using paper analytical devices. Analytical Methods. 2019;11(37):4727–32.
16.
<1225> Validation of compendial procedures. 2021;
17.
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008;9.
18.
Ante L. Non-fungible token (NFT) markets on the Ethereum blockchain: Temporal development, cointegration and interrelations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021;
19.
Mettler M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here. 2016;
20.
Mettler M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom). IEEE; 2016. p. 1–3.
21.
Massaro M. Digital transformation in the healthcare sector through blockchain technology. Insights from academic research and business developments. Technovation. 2023;120:102386.
22.
Mistry C, Thakker U, Gupta R, Obaidat MS, Tanwar S, Kumar N, et al. MedBlock: An AI-enabled and Blockchain-driven Medical Healthcare System for COVID-19. ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE; 2021. p. 1–6.
23.
Taylor P. Applying blockchain technology to medicine traceability.
24.
Mackey TK, Kuo TT, Gummadi B, Clauson KA, Church G, Grishin D, et al. ‘Fit-for-purpose?’ – challenges and opportunities for applications of blockchain technology in the future of healthcare. BMC Medicine. 2019;17(1).
25.
Sylim P, Liu F, Marcelo A, Fontelo P. Blockchain Technology for Detecting Falsified and Substandard Drugs in Distribution: Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Intervention. JMIR Research Protocols. 2018;7(9):e10163.
26.
Clauson KA, Breeden EA, Davidson C, Mackey TK. Leveraging Blockchain Technology to Enhance Supply Chain Management in Healthcare: Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2018;
27.
Tseng JH, Liao YC, Chong B, Liao S wei. Governance on the Drug Supply Chain via Gcoin Blockchain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(6):1055.
28.
Vruddhula S. Application of on-dose identification and blockchain to prevent drug counterfeiting. Pathogens and Global Health. 2018;112(4):161–161.
29.
Mackey T, Nayyar G. A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines.
30.
Mackey TK, Nayyar G. A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2017;16(5):587–602.
31.
Copyright Ownership: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, adapt, enhance this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles