Securing the Chain of Custody and Integrity of Data in a Global North-South Partnership to Monitor the Quality of Essential Medicines

Kathleen Hayes Orcid logo ,
Kathleen Hayes
Natalie Meyers Orcid logo ,
Natalie Meyers
Christopher Sweet Orcid logo ,
Christopher Sweet
Ayenew Ashenef Orcid logo ,
Ayenew Ashenef
Tim Johann Orcid logo ,
Tim Johann
Marya Lieberman Orcid logo ,
Marya Lieberman
David Kochalko Orcid logo
David Kochalko

Published: 21.03.2022.

Biochemistry

Volume 5, Issue 2 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v5.230

Abstract

Substandard and falsified (SF) pharmaceuticals account for an estimated 10% of the pharmaceutical supply chain in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where a lack of regulatory and laboratory resources limits the ability to conduct effective post-market surveillance and allows SF products to penetrate the supply chain. The Distributed Pharmaceutical Analysis Laboratory (DPAL) was established in 2014 to expand testing of pharmaceutical dosage forms sourced from LMICs; DPAL is an alliance of academic institutions throughout the United States and abroad that provides high quality, validated chemical analysis of pharmaceutical dosage forms sourced from partners in LMICs. Results from analysis are reported to relevant regulatory agencies and are used to inform purchasing decisions made by in-country stakeholders. As the DPAL program has expanded to testing more than 1000 pharmaceutical dosage forms annually, challenges have surfaced regarding data management and sample tracking. Here, we describe a pilot project between DPAL and ARTiFACTs that applies blockchain to organize and manage key data generated during the DPAL workflow, including a sample’s progress through the workflow, its physical location, provenance of metadata, and lab reputability. Recording time and date stamps with this data will create a permanent and verifiable chain-of-custody for samples. This secure, distributed ledger will be linked to an easy-to-use dashboard, allowing stakeholders to view results and experimental details for each sample in real time and verify the integrity of DPAL analysis data. Introducing this blockchain-based system as a pilot will allow us to test the technology with real users analyzing real samples. Feedback from users will be recorded and necessary adjustments will be made to the system before the implementation of blockchain across all DPAL sites. Anticipated benefits of implementing blockchain for managing DPAL data include efficient management for routing work, increasing throughput, creating a chain of custody for samples and their data in alignment with the distributed nature of DPAL, and using the analysis results to detect patterns of quality within and across brands of products and develop enhanced sampling techniques and best practices. 

Keywords

References

1.
WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring System for substandard and falsified medical products.
2.
A study on the public health and socioeconomic impact of substandard and falsified medical products.
3.
Roth L, Bempong D, Babigumira JB, Banoo S, Cooke E, Jeffreys D, et al. Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems. Globalization and Health. 2018;14(1).
4.
Ndomondo-Sigonda M, Miot J, Naidoo S, Dodoo A, Kaale E. Medicines Regulation in Africa: Current State and Opportunities. Pharmaceutical Medicine. 2017;31(6):383–97.
5.
Bliese SL, Berta M, Lieberman M. Involving Students in the Distributed Pharmaceutical Analysis Laboratory: A Citizen-Science Project to Evaluate Global Medicine Quality. Journal of Chemical Education. 2020;97(11):3976–83.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles