Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Informed Consent Process and Patient Engagement in a Clinical Trial Pilot

Baldwin C. Mak Orcid logo ,
Baldwin C. Mak
Bryan T. Addeman Orcid logo ,
Bryan T. Addeman
Jia Chen Orcid logo ,
Jia Chen
Kim A. Papp Orcid logo ,
Kim A. Papp
Melinda J. Gooderham Orcid logo ,
Melinda J. Gooderham
Lyn C. Guenther Orcid logo ,
Lyn C. Guenther
Yi Liu Orcid logo ,
Yi Liu
Uli C. Broedl Orcid logo ,
Uli C. Broedl
Marianne E. Logger Orcid logo
Marianne E. Logger

Published: 21.10.2022.

Biochemistry

Volume 4, Issue 1 (2021)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v4.182

Abstract

Objective: Despite the implementation of quality assurance procedures, current clinical trial management processes are time-consuming, costly, and often susceptible to error. This can result in limited trust, transparency, and process inefficiencies, without true patient empowerment. The objective of this study was to determine whether blockchain technology could enforce trust, transparency, and patient empowerment in the clinical trial data management process, while reducing trial cost. Design: In this proof of concept pilot, we deployed a Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchain system in an active clinical trial setting to assess the impact of blockchain technology on mean monitoring visit time and cost, non-compliances, and user experience. Using a parallel study design, we compared differences between blockchain technology and standard methodology. Results: A total of 12 trial participants, seven study coordinators and three clinical research associates across five sites participated in the pilot. Blockchain technology significantly reduces total mean monitoring visit time and cost versus standard trial management (475 to 7 min; P = 0.001; €722 to €10; P = 0.001 per participant/visit, respectively), while enhancing patient trust, transparency, and empowerment in 91, 82 and 63% of the patients, respectively. No difference in non-compliances as a marker of trial quality was detected. Conclusion: Blockchain technology holds promise to improve patient-centricity and to reduce trial cost compared to conventional clinical trial management. The ability of this technology to improve trial quality warrants further investigation.

Keywords

References

1.
Gaba P, Bhatt DL. The COVID-19 pandemic: a catalyst to improve clinical trials. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2020;17(11):673–5.
2.
Annual inspection summary report. 2015;
3.
Annual report of the good clinical practice inspectors working group. 2016;
4.
Research and analysis: good clinical practice inspection metrics. 15AD;
5.
Oversight of clinical investigations -a risk-based approach to monitoring [Internet]. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
6.
Baigent C, Harrell FE, Buyse M, Emberson JR, Altman DG. Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods. Clinical Trials. 2008;5(1):49–55.
7.
guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2) [Internet]. International Council for Harmonisation.
8.
WMA Declaration of Helsinki -ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [Internet]. World Medical Association.
9.
Inspectional Observation Data Set FY 2016.
10.
Nugent T, Upton D, Cimpoesu M. Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts. F1000Research. 2016;5:2541.
11.
Omar IA, Jayaraman R, Salah K, Simsekler MCE, Yaqoob I, Ellahham S. Ensuring protocol compliance and data transparency in clinical trials using Blockchain smart contracts. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2020;20(1).
12.
Benchoufi M, Ravaud P. Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality. Trials. 2017;18(1).
13.
Choudhury O, Sarker H, Rudolph N, Foreman M, Fay N, Dhuliawala M, et al. Enforcing Human Subject Regulations using Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2018;
14.
Omar IA, Jayaraman R, Salah K, Yaqoob I, Ellahham S. Applications of Blockchain Technology in Clinical Trials: Review and Open Challenges. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2020;46(4):3001–15.
15.
Maslove DM, Klein J, Brohman K, Martin P. Using Blockchain Technology to Manage Clinical Trials Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2018;6(4):e11949.
16.
Elmer M, Florek C, Gabryelski L, Greene A, Inglis AM, et al. Amplifying the Voice of the Patient in Clinical Research: Development of Toolkits for Use in Designing and Conducting Patient-Centered Clinical Studies. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2020;54(6):1489–500.
17.
Branch E. Ways to lower costs of clinical trials and how CROs help [Internet]. Am Pharm Rev. 2016;
18.
Benchoufi M, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Research. 2018;6:66.
19.
Wong DR, Bhattacharya S, Butte AJ. Prototype of running clinical trials in an untrustworthy environment using blockchain. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1).

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles