The Last Mile: DSCSA Solution Through Blockchain Technology: Drug Tracking, Tracing, and Verification at the Last Mile of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain with BRUINchain

William Chien ,
William Chien
Josenor De Jesus ,
Josenor De Jesus
Ben Taylor ,
Ben Taylor
Victor Dods ,
Victor Dods
Leo Alekseyev ,
Leo Alekseyev
Diane Shoda ,
Diane Shoda
Perry B. Shieh
Perry B. Shieh

Published: 21.10.2022.

Biochemistry

Volume 3, Issue 1 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v3.134

Abstract

Purpose: As part of the FDA’s DSCSA Pilot Project Program, UCLA and its solution partner, LedgerDomain (collectively referred to as the team hereafter), focused on building a complete, working blockchain-based system, BRUINchain, which would meet all the key objectives of the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) for a dispenser operating solely on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technology. Methods: The BRUINchain system requirements include scanning the drug package for a correctly formatted 2D barcode, flagging expired product, verifying the product with the manufacturer, and quarantining suspect and illegitimate products at the last mile: pharmacist to patient, the most complex area of the drug supply chain. The authors demonstrate a successful implementation where product-tracing notifications are sent automatically to key stakeholders, resulting in enhanced timeliness and reduction in paperwork burden. At the core of this effort was a blockchain-based solution to track and trace changes in custody of drug. As an immutable, time-stamped, near-real-time (50-millisecond latency), auditable record of transactions, BRUINchain makes it possible for supply chain communities to arrive at a single version of the truth. BRUINchain was tested with real data on real caregivers administering life-saving medications to real patients at one of the busiest pharmacies in the United States. Results: In addition to communicating with the manufacturer directly for verification, BRUINchain also initiated suspect product notifications. During the study, a 100% success rate was observed across scanning, expiration detection, and counterfeit detection; and paperwork reduction from approximately 1 hour to less than a minute. The authors demonstrate a successful implementation where product-tracing notifications are sent automatically to key stakeholders, resulting in enhanced timeliness and reduction in paperwork burden. At the core of this effort was a blockchain-based solution to track and trace changes in custody of drug. As an immutable, time-stamped, near-real-time (50-millisecond latency), auditable record of transactions, BRUINchain makes it possible for supply chain communities to arrive at a single version of the truth. BRUINchain was tested with real data on real caregivers administering life-saving medications to real patients at one of the busiest pharmacies in the United States.   Conclusions: By automatically interrogating the manufacturer’s relational database with our blockchain-based system, our results indicate a projected DSCSA compliance cost of 17 cents per unit, and potentially much more depending on regulatory interpretation and speed of verification. We project that this cost could be reduced with manufacturers’ adoption of a highly performant, fully automated end-to-end system based on digital ledger technology (DLT). In an examination of the interoperability of such a system, we elaborate on its capacity to enable verification in real time without a human in the loop, the key feature driving lower compliance cost. With 4.2 billion prescriptions being dispensed each year in the United States, DLT would not only reduce the projected per-unit cost to 13 cents per unit (saving $183 million in annual labor costs), but also serve as a major bulwark against bad or fraudulent transactions, reduce the need for safety stock, and enhance the detection and removal of potentially dangerous drugs from the drug supply chain to protect U.S. consumers.

Keywords

References

1.
U. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA).
2.
Fed Regist Document. 2014;(34):9745–7.
3.
U. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. DSCSA Pilot Project Program.
4.
Chien W, De Jesus J, Taylor B, Dods V, Alekseyev L, Shoda D, et al. The Last Mile: DSCSA Solution Through Blockchain Technology: Drug Tracking, Tracing, and Verification at the Last Mile of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain with BRUINchain. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2020;
5.
Health. About us: Best healthcare, latest medical technology. 2020;
6.
Angeles L. CA: UCLA Health.
7.
Sklodosky C, Shakur I, Plante G, Taylor B. Transforming pharmaceutical clinical supply messaging with blockchain. Version 1.8 [Internet]. Clinical Supply Blockchain Working Group. 2019;
8.
Drug Supply Chain Security Act implementation: Identification of suspect product and notification guidance for industry.
9.
Online transaction processing (OLTP) [Internet]. Microsoft Azure. 2019;
10.
Online analytical processing (OLAP) [Internet]. Microsoft Azure. 2018;
11.
Chowdhury MJM, Colman A, Kabir MA, Han J, Sarda P. Blockchain Versus Database: A Critical Analysis. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE). IEEE; 2018. p. 1348–53.
12.
Archa, Alangot B, Achuthan K. Trace and Track: Enhanced Pharma Supply Chain Infrastructure to Prevent Fraud. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 189–95.
13.
Update: Barcode readability for DSCSA 2023 interoperability.
14.
Ewing. NJ: GS1 US. 2019;
15.
Finkel RS, McDermott MP, Kaufmann P, Darras BT, Chung WK, Sproule DM, et al. Observational study of spinal muscular atrophy type I and implications for clinical trials. Neurology. 2014;83(9):810–7.
16.
Spinraza. (nusinersen) injection, for intrathecal use. 2016;
17.
Solutions. Blockchain: Innovations in health data sharing with FDA and Booz Allen. 2019;
18.
Chien W, De Jesus J, Taylor B, Dods V, Alekseyev L, Shoda D, et al. The Last Mile: DSCSA Solution Through Blockchain Technology: Drug Tracking, Tracing, and Verification at the Last Mile of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain with BRUINchain. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2020;
19.
Androulaki E, Barger A, Bortnikov V, Cachin C, Christidis K, De Caro A, et al. Hyperledger fabric. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference. ACM; 2018.
20.
Voshmgir S. Token economy: How blockchains and smart contracts revolutionize the economy. 2009;
21.
1938;(b).
22.
1938;(9).
23.
Product identifiers under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act questions and answers guidance for industry.
24.
Identification of investigational products in clinical trials application standard. Release no. 1.0.1. [Internet]. GS1 US.
25.
Ledgerdomain.
26.
Update: Barcode readability for DSCSA 2023 interoperability. 2019;
27.
Ewing. NJ: GS1 US. 2019;
28.
29.
Assessing current implementation of DSCSA serialization requirements [Internet]. 2018;
30.
31.
Drug notification to FDA. 2019;
32.
Mikulic M. Total number of medical prescriptions dispensed in the U.S. from. 2009;
33.
Pharmacists, Washington. DC: United States Department of Labor. 2019;
34.
U. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer costs for employee compensation.
35.
Washington. DC: United States Department of Labor. 2019;
36.
Fein A. 2018;
37.
Mdm Analytics. 2019;
38.
Chien W, De Jesus J, Taylor B, Dods V, Alekseyev L, Shoda D, et al. The Last Mile: DSCSA Solution Through Blockchain Technology: Drug Tracking, Tracing, and Verification at the Last Mile of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain with BRUINchain. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2020;
39.
Coase RH. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics. 1960;3:1–44.
40.
Calabresi G, Melamed A. Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review. 1972;1089–128.
41.
Barcodes. Inc. [Internet]. Not barcodes or RFID, but both. 2012;

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles