A substantial administrative burden is placed on healthcare professionals as they manage and progress through their careers. Identity verification, pre-employment screening and appraisals: the bureaucracy associated with each of these processes takes precious time out of a healthcare professional's day. Time that could have been spent focused on patient care. In the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, it is more important than ever to optimize these professionals' time. This paper presents the synthesis of a design workshop held at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (RCPE) and subsequent interviews with healthcare professionals. The main research question posed is whether these processes can be re-imagined using digital technologies, specifically Self-Sovereign Identity? A key contribution in the paper is the development of a set of user-led requirements and design principles for identity systems used within healthcare. These are then contrasted with the design principles found in the literature. The results of this study confirm the need and potential of professionalising identity and credential management throughout a healthcare professional's career.
Ruscoe M. Identity verification and authentication standard for digital health and care services. Health and Social Care Information Centre. 2018;19.
3.
Holmes C. Distributed ledger technologies for public good: leadership, collaboration and innovation. 2018;
4.
Keswani R, Taft T, Coté G, Keefer L. Increased levels of stress and burnout are related to decreased physician experience and to interventional gastroenterology career choice: findings from a US survey of endoscopists. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;(10):1734.
5.
Heponiemi T, Hyppönen H, Vehko T, Kujala S, Aalto AM, Vänskä J, et al. Finnish physicians’ stress related to information systems keeps increasing: a longitudinal three-wave survey study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2017;17(1).
6.
Ferguson N, Laydon D, Gilani N, G. Report 9: impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce covid19 mortality and healthcare demand. Ageing and Mental Health. 2020;
7.
Mettler M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here. 2016;1–3.
8.
Thouin M, Hoffman J, Ford E. The effect of information technology investment on firm-level performance in the health care industry. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;(1):60–8.
9.
Berwick D, Nolan T, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Affairs. 2008;(3):759–69.
10.
Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;(6):573–6.
11.
F. of State Medical Boards. Healthcare and digital credentials: technical, legal and regulatory considerations. Tech Rep. 2019;
12.
Identity checks. 2019;
13.
Dyer C. Gmc checks 3000 doctors’ credentials after fraudulent psychiatrist practised for 23 years. NHS Employers. 2018;
14.
Gallant J. The laws of identity. 2019;
15.
Goodman M. Dr death. 2016;
16.
Federation credentials verification service.
17.
Read T. Clinical skills passport: a method to increase participation in clinical skills by medical students during a surgery clerkship. J Surg Educ. 2017;(6):975–9.
18.
Cser A. Forrester’s risk-driven identity and access management process framework. 2017;
19.
Abramson W, Van Deursen NE, Buchanan WJ. Trust-by-Design: Evaluating Issues and Perceptions within Clinical Passporting. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2020;
20.
Reed D, Sporny M, Sabadello M. Decentralized identifiers (DIDs) v1.0. Tech. Rep. 2019;
Liang X, Shetty S, Zhao J, Bowden D, Li D, Liu J. Towards de-centralized accountability and self-sovereignty in healthcare systems. 2017;387–98.
23.
Liang X, Zhao J, Shetty S, Liu J, Li D. Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications. 2017;1–5.
24.
Seppa¨nen R, Blomqvist K, Sundqvist S. Measuring inter-organizational trust-a critical review of the empirical research in 1990-2003. Ind Market Manag. 2007;(2):249–65.
25.
Van Den Berg B, Keymolen E. Regulating security on the internet: control versus trust. Int Rev Law Comput Tech. 2017;(2):188–205.
26.
Smolenski N. The evolution of trust in a digital economy. 2018;
27.
Cameron K. The laws of identity. 2005;
28.
Cameron K. The laws of identity on the blockchain. 2018;
29.
Allen C. The path to self-sovereign identity. 2016;
30.
Tobin A, Reed D. The inevitable rise of selfsovereign identity. The Sovrin Foundation. 2016;
31.
Dunphy P, Petitcolas F. A first look at identity management schemes on the blockchain. IEEE Security & Privacy. 2018;(4):20–9.
32.
Ferdous M, Chowdhury F, Alassafi M. In search of self-sovereign identity leveraging blockchain technology. IEEE Access. 2019;79.
33.
Van Bokkem D, Hageman R, Koning G, Nguyen L, Zarin N. Self-sovereign identity solutions: the necessity of blockchain technology. 2019;12816.
34.
Stokkink Q, Pouwelse J. Deployment of a blockchain-based self-sovereign identity. 2018;1336–42.
35.
Toth K, Anderson-Priddy A. Selfsovereign digital identity: a paradigm shift for identity. 2019;(3):17–27.
36.
Spierings J, Demeyer T. 2019;
37.
Schraffenberger H. IRMA made easy. 2020;
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
