Moving Beyond POCs and Pilots to Mainstream: Discovery and Lessons from Blockchain in Healthcare

Sathya Krishnasamy, MS Orcid logo ,
Sathya Krishnasamy, MS
Badri Narayanan Gopalakrishnan, PhD Orcid logo
Badri Narayanan Gopalakrishnan, PhD

Published: 29.12.2023.

Biochemistry

Volume 6, Issue 2 (2023)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v6.280

Abstract

Blockchain technologies has been in the forefront of innovation and is maturing at a fast pace with fintech leading the way. Though the innovation in the permissionless space is high, the enterprise adoption has still not caught up. The reasons include a variety of reasons including inadequate understanding of the technology, full awareness even in enterprises, unclear regulations, and lack of exploration and evangelism to really understand the reimagination of shared enterprise business processes. Most enterprise blockchain efforts are run from a small exploratory group in large companies and has NOT moved beyond pilots or limited production tryouts in to mainstream adoption at scale. This is because there is not much knowledge about what is possible for reimagining current business processes which are mostly unilateral.  This is more obvious in healthcare. A horizontal transformation enabler like the blockchain technology can effect collaborative business processes in a networked world. This paper explores the root causes for the challengesand suggests a methodology for discovery of the key inflection points for potential collaborative business processes and  the re-engineering that would be needed. Blockchain in enterprise are not an isolated piece of technology, and has to interact with the enterprise assets, and there has to be mechanisms for aggregating the data that is meaningful to the counter parties for shared collaboration. Equally important is solid and a stair-stepping change management plan for the blockchain efforts to meet operations mainstream and gradually move the operations to the end state. Possibilities and results of the collaborative processes have to be shown in meticulous economic rigor for any possibilities of blockchain efforts getting the enterprise portfolio dollars against many enterprise systems that are already overloading budgets. The paper will cite the journey in a reference implementation with results, findings at the technical, functional, operational and change management levels for healthcare administration executives and portfolio managers.

Keywords

References

1.
Fang HSA. Commercially Successful Blockchain Healthcare Projects: A Scoping Review. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2021;
2.
Geleziunaite G, Manion S. ‘Block-Change’: Exploring Change Management  Principles to Overcome Challenges in Blockchain Adoption. The Journal of The British Blockchain Association. 2023;6(1):1–7.
3.
O’Donoghue O, Vazirani AA, Brindley D, Meinert E. Design Choices and Trade-Offs in Health Care Blockchain Implementations: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(5):e12426.
4.
Vazirani AA, O’Donoghue O, Brindley D, Meinert E. Implementing Blockchains for Efficient Health Care: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(2):e12439.
5.
Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2014;12(6):573–6.
6.
Hasselgren A, Kralevska K, Gligoroski D, Pedersen SA, Faxvaag A. Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences—A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020;134:104040.
7.
Agbo CC, Mahmoud QH, Eklund JM. Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2019;7(2):56.
8.
Azaria A, Ekblaw A, Vieira T, Lippman A. MedRec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. 2016;25–30.
9.
Angraal S, Krumholz HM, Schulz WL. Blockchain Technology. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2017;10(9).
10.
Mettler M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here. 2016;1–3.
11.
Hussien HM, Yasin SM, Udzir SNI, Zaidan AA, Zaidan BB. A Systematic Review for Enabling of Develop a Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Application: Taxonomy, Substantially Analysis, Motivations, Challenges, Recommendations and Future Direction. Journal of Medical Systems. 2019;43(10).
12.
Meinert E, Alturkistani A, Foley KA, Osama T, Car J, Majeed A, et al. Blockchain Implementation in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review. JMIR Research Protocols. 2019;8(2):e10994.
13.
Chukwu E, Garg L. A Systematic Review of Blockchain in Healthcare: Frameworks, Prototypes, and Implementations. IEEE Access. 2020;8:21196–214.
14.
Fatoum H, Hanna S, Halamka JD, Sicker DC, Spangenberg P, Hashmi SK. Blockchain Integration With Digital Technology and the Future of Health Care Ecosystems: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(11):e19846.
15.
Yeung K. The Health Care Sector’s Experience of Blockchain: A Cross-disciplinary Investigation of Its Real Transformative Potential. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(12):e24109.
16.
Abu-elezz I, Hassan A, Nazeemudeen A, Househ M, Abd-alrazaq A. The benefits and threats of blockchain technology in healthcare: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020;142:104246.
17.
AlShamsi M, Al-Emran M, Shaalan K. A Systematic Review on Blockchain Adoption. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(9):4245.
18.
Satybaldy A, Hasselgren A, Nowostawski M. Decentralized Identity Management for E-Health Applications: State-of-the-Art and Guidance for Future Work. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2022;
19.
Maher M, Khan I. From Sharing to Selling. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2022;
20.
A survey on blockchain for healthcare: challenges, benefits, and future directions. IEEE Journals & Magazine. 2023;
21.
Hawayek J, AbouElKhir, MD O. Problems with Medical Claims that Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Blockchain Can Fix. Blockchain in Healthcare Today. 2023;6(2).
22.
Lakhan A, Thinnukool O, Groenli TM, Khuwuthyakorn P. RBEF: Ransomware Efficient Public Blockchain Framework for Digital Healthcare Application. Sensors. 2023;23(11):5256.
23.
AbuHalimeh A, Ali O. Comprehensive review for healthcare data quality challenges in blockchain technology. Frontiers in Big Data. 2023;6.
24.
Nicolai B, Tallarico S, Pellegrini L, Gastaldi L, Vella G, Lazzini S. Blockchain for electronic medical record: assessing stakeholders’ readiness for successful blockchain adoption in health-care. Measuring Business Excellence. 2022;27(1):157–71.
25.
Amihm.org. 2021;
26.
Akbar MA, Leiva V, Rafi S, Qadri SF, Mahmood S, Alsanad A. Towards roadmap to implement blockchain in healthcare systems based on a maturity model. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 2022;34(12).
27.
Bazel MA, Mohammed F, Ahmad M. A Systematic Review on the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in the Healthcare Industry. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology. 2023;9:e4.
28.
Healthcare blockchain adoption rate worldwide. 2017;
29.
Statista.
30.
Thielking M. Can blockchain solve health care’s security problems? The financial industry offers a valuable case study. 2022;
31.
The state of enterprise blockchain adoption in 2023. 2023;
32.
High U. health care spending: where is it all going? 2023;
33.
Morey J. Council post: the future of blockchain in healthcare.
34.
Forbes. 2023;
35.
Blockchain in healthcare discovery framework.
36.
Github. Healthcare-Discovery-Framework Copyright Ownership: This is an open-access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, adapt, enhance this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, and the use is non-commercial. 2023;

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles