Model Complexity Reduction for ZKML Healthcare Applications: Privacy Protection and Inference Optimization for ZKML Applications—A Reference Implementation With Synthetic ICHOM Dataset

Sathya Krishnasamy Orcid logo ,
Sathya Krishnasamy
Contact Sathya Krishnasamy

ChainAim , Newington, Connecticut , United States

Ilangovan Govindarajan Orcid logo
Ilangovan Govindarajan

GuardianMedx , Las Vegas, Nevada

Published: 31.08.2024.

Volume 7, Issue 2 (2024)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v7.340

Abstract

Web 3.0 represents the next significant evolution of the internet that embodies the underlying decentralized network architectures, distributed ledgers, and advanced AI capabilities. Though the technologies are maturing rapidly, considerable barriers exist to high-scale adoption. The author discusses the barriers and the mitigations through specific technologies maturing to solve those issues in an earlier paper titled Moving Beyond POCs and Pilots, published in 2023 in Blockchain in Healthcare Today. These include privacy-preserving technologies, off-chain and on-chain design optimizations, and the multi-dimensional approach needed in planning and adopting these technologies. As an extension, this paper discusses one such enabler, zero knowledge machine learning (ZKML), which merges two streams of technology in unique ways to address problems in privacy and the cost of inference. Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) allow one party to prove the validity of a statement to another party without revealing any additional information about the statement itself. The ZKML combines the cryptographic principle of ZKP with machine learning (ML) techniques. It is still a maturing technology and needs baselines for applications in global healthcare. In this effort, the authors conceptualize the technical and operational fea-sibility of using ZKML and implement a reference healthcare implementation using the synthetic International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) in the evaluation phase in a global healthcare setting for high-volume data collection, including patient-reported outcomes. Model complexity reduction is researched and reported for the ICHOM diabetes dataset to advance the usage of ML models in global standards of health-care data collection in network decentralized architectures for increased data protection and efficiencies.

Keywords

References

1.
Goldwasser S, Micali S, Rackoff C. The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. 1985;
2.
Fiat A, Shamir A. How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature problems. 2019;186–94.
3.
Ben-Sasson E, Chiesa A, Tromer E, Virza M. Succinct non-interactive zero knowledge for a von neumann architecture. 2019;
4.
Ben-Sasson E, Bentov I, Horesh Y, Riabzev M. Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity.
5.
Guerra-Manzanares A, Lechuga J, Maniatakos M, Shamout F. Privacy-preserving machine learning for healthcare: open challenges and future perspectives. arXiv. 2023;1–13.
6.
Gotor A. Maximizing model efficiency with model-complexity-reducer (MCR). zkcook/docs/mcr.pdf at main gizatechxyz/zkcook [Internet]. GitHub. 2024;
7.
Das AK, Saboo B, Maheshwari A, Nair V M, Banerjee S, C J, et al. Health care delivery model in India with relevance to diabetes care. Heliyon. 2022;8(10):e10904.
8.
Musacchio N, Giancaterini A, Guaita G, Ozzello A, Pellegrini MA, Ponzani P, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Diabetes Care: A Position Statement of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(6):e16922.
9.
ICHOM. Diabetes. 2024;
10.
Benning L, Das-Gupta Z, Sousa Fialho L, Wissig S, Tapela N, Gaunt S. Balancing adaptability and standardisation: insights from 27 routinely implemented ICHOM standard sets. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22(1).

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles