Decentralized Identity Management for E-Health Applications: State-of-the-Art and Guidance for Future Work

Abylay Satybaldy Orcid logo ,
Abylay Satybaldy
Anton Hasselgren Orcid logo ,
Anton Hasselgren
Mariusz Nowostawski
Mariusz Nowostawski

Published: 21.03.2022.

Biochemistry

Volume 5, Issue 2 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v5.195

Abstract

Background: The increasing usage of various online services requires an efficient digital identity management approach. Unfortunately, the original Internet protocols were not designed with built-in identity management, which creates challenges related to privacy, security, and usability. Thereis an increasing concern regarding the management of these sensitive data in the society, who have access to it and where it is stored. Blockchain technology can, potentially offer a secure solution to address this problem, in a decentralized manner without any centralized authority. This is of importance for e-health services where the patient and the healthcare provider often are required toprove their identity. Blockchain technology can be utilized for creating digital identities and make themanagement of those identities easier, giving a higher degree of control to the user than what current solutions offer. It can be used for creating a digital identity on the blockchain, making it easier to manage for individuals and entities, giving them greater control over who has their personal in-formation and how they handle it, and it could be utilized to create a higher degree of trust andsecurity to e-health applications. Objective The aim of this research work is to review the state-of-the- art regarding blockchain-based decentralized identity management for healthcare applications. Based on this summary, we provide a viewpoint on how blockchain-based decentralized identity frameworks couldbe utilized for virtualized healthcare applications. Method This research has applied a scoping, semi-systematic review approach to summarize thestate-of-the-art. Included identity management systems were evaluated based on seven criteria:Autonomy, Authority, Availability, Approval, Confidentiality, Tenacity and Interoperability ResultsSeven blockchain-based identity management systems were included and evaluated in this work:These include solutions built with Ethereum, Hyperledger Indy, Hyperledger Fabric, Hedera andSovrin  blockchains. Conclusion Digital identity management is crucial for virtual healthcare. Decentralized identity management for healthcare purposes is currently being explored, both in academia and the private sector. More work is needed with the aim to improve the efficiency of current DIM solutions and to fully understand what technical frameworks are best suited for e-health applications.

Keywords

References

1.
Zhang P, Schmidt D, White J, Lenz G. Blockchain technology use cases in healthcare. 2018;1–41.
2.
Siyal AA, Junejo AZ, Zawish M, Ahmed K, Khalil A, Soursou G. Applications of Blockchain Technology in Medicine and Healthcare: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Cryptography. 2019;3(1):3.
3.
Hasselgren A, Hanssen Rensaa JA, Kralevska K, Gligoroski D, Faxvaag A. Blockchain for Increased Trust in Virtual Health Care: Proof-of-Concept Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(7):e28496.
4.
Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research. 1981;10(2):141–63.
5.
Bouras MA, Lu Q, Zhang F, Wan Y, Zhang T, Ning H. Distributed Ledger Technology for eHealth Identity Privacy: State of The Art and Future Perspective. Sensors. 2020;20(2):483.
6.
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin. 2017;
7.
Hasselgren A, Kralevska K, Gligoroski D, Pedersen SA, Faxvaag A. Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences—A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020;134:104040.
8.
Weik MH. identity. Computer Science and Communications Dictionary. Springer US; 2000. p. 746–746.
9.
Ellingsen J. Self-sovereign identity systems: opportunities and challenges. 2019;
10.
Hughes J, Maler E. Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v2.0 technical overview. OASIS SSTC Working Draft. 2005;29–38.
11.
Sakimura N, Bradley D, De Mederiso B, Jones M, Jay E. 2011;
12.
Hardt D. The oauth 2.0 authorization framework. RFC.
13.
Mertens W, Rosemann M. Digital identity 3.0: the platform for the people. 2015;
14.
Satchell C, Shanks G, Howard S, Murphy J. Identity crisis: user perspectives on multiplicity and control in federated identity management. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2011;30(1):51–62.
15.
Rose J, Rehse O, Rober B. The value of our digital identity. 2012;
16.
de Marneffe P. Vice Laws and Self-Sovereignty. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2012;7(1):29–41.
17.
Allen C. The path to self-sovereign identity.
18.
Evernym. The world’s leading platform for verifiable credentials.
19.
Sertoid. Trust with control. 13AD;
20.
Ion. Layer 2 decentralized identifier network. 10AD;
21.
Satybaldy A, Nowostawski M, Ellingsen J. Self-sovereign identity systems. 2019;447–61.
22.
López M. Self-sovereign identity-the future of identity: self-sovereignity, digital wallets, and blockchain. 2019;
23.
24.
W3c. Verifiable credentials data model 1.
25.
Dif. 10AD;
26.
Iyengar R, Cnn. Twitter accounts of Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and others apparently hacked.
27.
Berghel H. Equifax and the Latest Round of Identity Theft Roulette. Computer. 2017;50(12):72–6.
28.
Isaak J, Hanna MJ. User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection. Computer. 2018;51(8):56–9.
29.
Forbes. Understanding the first American financial data leak: how did it happen and what does it mean.
30.
Andersson T. The medical leadership challenge in healthcare is an identity challenge. Leadership in Health Services. 2015;28(2):83–99.
31.
Houtan B, Hafid AS, Makrakis D. A Survey on Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Patient Identity in Healthcare. IEEE Access. 2020;8:90478–94.
32.
Khurshid A, Holan C, Cowley C, Alexander J, Harrell DT, Usman M, et al. Designing and testing a blockchain application for patient identity management in healthcare. JAMIA Open. 2021;4(3).
33.
Mikula T, Jacobsen R. Identity and access management with blockchain in electronic healthcare records. 2018;699–706.
34.
Sharma B, Halder R, Singh J. Blockchain-based interoperable healthcare using zero-knowledge proofs and proxy re-encryption. 2020;1–6.
35.
Javed IT, Alharbi F, Bellaj B, Margaria T, Crespi N, Qureshi KN. Health-ID: A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Identity Management for Remote Healthcare. Healthcare. 2021;9(6):712.
36.
W3c. Peer did method specification.
37.
Sovrin: a protocol and token for self-sovereign identity and decentralized trust. 2018;
38.
10AD;
39.
Truu. Trusted digital passports for healthcare professionals. 15AD;
40.
Mediblock. Own your health data. It’s rightfully yours.
41.
Mediblock. Medibloc techinical whitepaper.
42.
Mediblock. Good Moonhwa Hospital. :327.
43.
Mediblock. :64129.
44.
Hedera. Hashgraph consensus algorithm.
45.
Hedera. Hedera hashgraph for data integrity & authenticity. 20AD;
46.
Copyright Ownership: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, adapt, enhance this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles