Scalability Performance Analysis of Blockchain Using Hierarchical Model in Healthcare

Lipsa Sadath, MSc, MCA ,
Lipsa Sadath, MSc, MCA
Deepti Mehrotra ,
Deepti Mehrotra
Anand Kumar Orcid logo
Anand Kumar

Published: 17.04.2024.

Biochemistry

Volume 7, Issue 1 (2024)

https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v7.295

Abstract

Blockchain technology has emerged as a pivotal point to enhance privacy and security in enterprise applications and cyber world. However, scalability is an issue researcher are grappling with, in large enterprises, especially in organizations bearing multiple levels of hierarchy and access privilege. Therefore, the existing models and consensus algorithms suffer one way or another. The medical or healthcare sector suffers this problem the most due to the huge amount of data and probably the central point of failure of the traditional database management system. This paper addresses the situation through a hierarchical model in Hyperledger fabric enterprise application through a healthcare sector use case. Multiple organizations are added to each hierarchy considering them as different organization levels (Hospitals, Hospital Governance, and Insurance company). Currently the first implementation has two levels of hierarchy to show networks of hospitals joining an Insurance Company. Our primary experiment revolves around this model to test and enhance the performance of the network. Performance of the model is assessed by varying and scaling environmental parameters such as the number of organizations, transaction numbers, channels, block intervals and block sizes. The benchmarking tool used is Hyperledger caliper to test various indicators such as success and failure rates along with throughput and latency. The current work only tests the scalability of the model with patient data.

Keywords

References

1.
Zhang S, Lee JH. Analysis of the main consensus protocols of blockchain. ICT Express. 2020;6(2):93–7.
2.
Zhang R, Preneel B. Publish or perish: a backward-compatible defense against selfish mining in bitcoin. :277–92.
3.
Pahlajani S, Kshirsagar A, Pachghare V. Survey on Private Blockchain Consensus Algorithms. 2019 1st International Conference on Innovations in Information and Communication Technology (ICIICT). IEEE; 2019. p. 1–6.
4.
Bonneau J, Narayanan A, Miller A, Clark J, Kroll JA, Felten EW. Mixcoin: Anonymity for Bitcoin with Accountable Mixes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. p. 486–504.
5.
Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Chen X, Wang H. An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress). IEEE; 2017. p. 557–64.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles